web analytics

Why Are Upload Speeds Slower Than Download Speeds?

Why Are Upload Speeds Slower Than Download Speeds?

Most of the people ask a question that why their upload speeds is slower than their download speeds.

Back in the mid- to late-1990′s we had devices that hooked our computers up to our phone lines called a “modems”. These modems would modulate digital information from your computer into analog beeps, boops, whistles, and static, then demodulate the response back into 1′s and 0′s. For a long time both upload and download speeds were both painfully slow, and nearly identical. When 56K modems came out they could (theoretically) reach 56,000 bits per second down — but only 33,600 bits per second up. Back in the day this was because home users were limited in the power they could use to push a signal back upstream, but ISPs weren’t bound by the same restrictions (or so the modem manufacturers told us).

Luckily we were able to get out of the dial-up days fairly quickly and now have purely digital Internet connections (no modulating or demodulating needed). It’s the same on our smartphones as it is on our home computers — all digital, all the time.

Interestingly, the differing upload versus download speeds have carried through to both wire-line and wireless data plans, for somewhat similar reasons.

Average Use

For the most part, typical users consume much more data than they produce. On my Android-powered smartphone I generally consume about 2GB per month — and that’s just cellular data, Wi-Fi not included. My uploads for the same period are substantially less — generally around 200MB.

End-users generally create things like emails, Tweets, and Facebook posts. These are all very small when compared to what we consume: music, movies, web pages full of images, custom ROMs, themes, podcasts. You get the idea.

Because that’s the case, service providers can limit the upload speeds to discourage people from pushing significant amounts of data such as pirated material, live webcam feeds, and hosting their own FTP and web servers. Of course if you need to do the latter they’ll gladly allow it — for a price.

Power Requirements

Usage scenarios aside, let’s think about power consumption for a moment.

Watts are a unit of power that essentially measures the rate of energy conversion. Electrical energy, stored in your battery, is used by the circuitry to run your phone, and eventually to power your antenna. With me so far?

Notice that I said “energy conversion” not “energy consumption”. That’s because energy can neither be created nor destroyed (something called “the law of conservation of energy”). Instead, the power in your battery is converted into something else: light, heat, sound waves, motion, and some of it is even radiated out of your antenna in the form of radio waves (Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, cellular voice, cellular data). If you ask most people, their battery doesn’t have that much power stored in it. Of course that’s a relative statement, but we’ll go with it for now.

The amount of power that you can radiate from your phone’s antenna is significantly less than the amount of power that can be radiated from those huge cell towers. The lower the power of the transmission, the slower the speed. This is exemplified by the speeds that you see when you are close to the tower (full bars) versus observed speeds when you’re far from the tower (1 bar). Even though you’re still outputting the same amount of power, it has a further distance to travel to the tower, so data-loss is higher and speeds are negotiated down accordingly.

Download speeds, the speed at which you can get data to your phone, isn’t as limited by power since the cell tower is connected to the electrical grid — not a little battery. Therefore, more data can be pushed with lower signal-loss, resulting in higher download speeds than upload speeds.

Of course there are other reasons, but those two should provide more than ample reason for most readers. For those of you that have more detail.Tell us in comments.


  • my name is

    please delete this article, you have told us a lie, you told us the reason why it is as such is that it is as such. you said upload is slow because it is slow, also u said uploasd is slow because people don’t use it, but people don’t use it because it is slow. so quit lying, eirther speak truth or shut up

    • tallmannerd

      you’re a fucking idiot.

      • LMFOA aS a GuEst

        ^^^^ Perfect! :D

  • Jon

    The only thing this article may explain is cell phone upload speeds. It does not talk about home internet upload speeds. Even landline speeds have a discrepancy of even 1/10 (I have 50mbs download speed and 5mbs upload) but only do I use a cable for my internet, but I use a home computer, not bound by any battery, which, according to you, is the biggest reason why we have low upload speeds for phones. If what you stated is right, why does the discrepancy between upload and download speeds exist in home internet plans?

    I highly doubt the reason why upload and download speeds are not uniform because of power consumption requirements. Fiber optic cables provided by Google Fiber allows an even 1000mbs upload AND download so your entire argument just flew out the window. By what you state in the article, this would create a power consumption so great it wouldn’t be possible. But it is possible, so there has to be more to the story than what you say.

    • KISS!

      The discrepancy between upload and download speeds exist in home internet plans are due to usage. Consumers download much more than we upload. Music, videos, pictures etc. Here in America, we do not produce as much as we consume. It’s a known fact!
      The reason download speeds are faster than upload is due to the ISP provider. It is a business model decision. If you want a faster upload speed, it will cost you and I mean in monetary terms not power or watts. The ISP’s save on bandwidth by doing this thus giving the consumer higher download speeds.
      KISS!! Keep It Simple Stupid!!

      • Jon

        Your analogy made no sense in the context of your response. You, sir, are an idiot. Not only that, you provided no proof as to your claims.

  • nerdant

    I agree…. this is a poorly written article. Not many technical facts.

  • Someone

    This is FAKE delete it now!

  • ddd

    this is rubbish! its nothing to do with the limitations of power consumption. its also restricted in home fiber optic routers